What Makes a Good M&A Advisor (Especially for Founder-Led Exits)
- Julian Mick
- Oct 12
- 2 min read
The short answer
A good advisor manufactures competition, reduces risk, and optimizes terms—not just price—while protecting your time, team, and legacy.
The six traits that matter most
Process disciplineA tight, stage-gated sell-side (IOIs → shortlist → management meetings → LOI) with clear calendars, templates, and decision rules. Discipline creates comparable bids and preserves leverage.
Buyer coverage & credibilityCurated access to strategics, PE, and family offices that actually buy in your revenue/EBITDA band. Credibility = buyers take the outreach seriously and move fast.
Preparation that turns into premiumValuation + EBITDA normalization, buyer-ready materials (teaser/exec summary/CIM), and a clean, permissioned data room. Readiness shortens diligence and improves structure (WC peg, escrow, earn-out, rollover).
Terms engineering (not just headline price)Ability to model scenarios, compare LOIs apples-to-apples, and negotiate price and terms: working capital, indemnities, earn-outs, seller notes, rollover, reps & warranties insurance.
Confidentiality & founder empathyNDA-gated outreach, selective lists, and messaging that won’t spook staff or customers. Weekly cadence that minimizes founder time and plans for leadership/customer continuity.
Execution to the finish lineProgram-manage diligence, drive advisors (QoE, legal, tax), anticipate issues, and keep momentum to signatures and funds flow. Close rate after LOI is a real differentiator.
What to ask before you hire
Process: “Show me your 6-step sell-side and a real timeline you’ve run recently.”
Coverage: “Who are the top 30 likely buyers for us, and why?”
Terms: “Share an anonymized LOI comparison grid you’ve used.”
Readiness: “What’s your 30/60/90 plan to make us buyer-ready?”
Confidentiality: “How do you prevent leaks? Who approves the long/short list?”
Metrics: “Median IOIs per process? Uplift vs first offer? Close rate post-LOI?”
References: “Can I speak with two founders you represented in the last 18 months?”
Red flags
“We’ll list it and see what happens.”
No written outreach plan or buyer list rationale.
Light on terms—obsessed with price only.
Can’t explain the working-capital peg or indemnity structure in plain English.
Vague on confidentiality (“We blast our newsletter”).
No post-LOI project plan or named owners for diligence workstreams.
How to evaluate fit in the first 2 weeks
Do they translate your story into buyer underwriting (why this asset, why now, what’s the plan)?
Are materials cited to data-room exhibits (credibility), not just marketing?
Does the longlist look curated (and realistic) for your size/sector?
Are you getting a decision cadence (weekly actions, risks, next steps), not status theater?
Fee alignment (quick guide)
Success-based with modest retainer during prep is common in founder-led LMM.
Ensure success fee tiers motivate higher outcomes (not quick mediocre closes).
Fix scope in writing: deliverables, timelines, approval rights on buyer lists and releases.
Why this matters for founder-led companies
You’re selling a life’s work: the right advisor protects people and culture while creating a real market.
Your time is scarce: they must shoulder prep, outreach, and diligence so performance doesn’t slip.
Outcome is multi-dimensional: the best advisors optimize certainty, speed, and terms—not just the headline number.
A 10-point quick checklist
Written 6-step process with dates
Indicative valuation + normalization plan
Teaser/exec summary/CIM outline drafted
Buyer longlist with reasons to buy
NDA templates & outreach scripts
LOI comparison model (price + terms)
Data room index & permissions model
Diligence calendar with owners
Weekly cadence (agenda, actions, risks)
Post-close people/customer continuity plan


